Elder Joseph B. Wirthlin (1917-2008) taught:
Some are lost because they are different. They feel as though they don’t belong. Perhaps because they are different, they find themselves slipping away from the flock. They may look, act, think, and speak differently than those around them and that sometimes causes them to assume they don’t fit in. They conclude that they are not needed.
Tied to this misconception is the erroneous belief that all members of the Church should look, talk, and be alike. The Lord did not people the earth with a vibrant orchestra of personalities only to value the piccolos of the world. Every instrument is precious and adds to the complex beauty of the symphony. All of Heavenly Father’s children are different in some degree, yet each has his own beautiful sound that adds depth and richness to the whole. This variety of creation itself is a testament of how the Lord values all His children.
I humbly suggest that LGBTQIA+ souls are part of the vibrant symphony.
See also: 15 Queer Composers You Should Know
– Tom Irvine
The people of Ammon knew that the wicked Lamanites would come to kill them but decided not to fight back. They had repented of killing. They buried their weapons deep in the ground and promised God they would never kill again. When the wicked Lamanites came and began killing them, they bowed to the ground and prayed. (Alma 24)
Let us now bury our muskets!
– Tom Irvine
From Paul Toscano
To understand the import of Elder Jeffrey Holland’s August 23, 2021, anti-LGBTQ+ address at BYU, it is important to consider several points:
Point 1. The members of the Quorum of the First Presidency do not line up in authority horizontally:
Nelson, Oaks, Eyring
Rather, they line up in authority vertically:
Nelson (first in authority)
Point 2. The members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles are not members of the Quorum of the First Presidency and they, too, do not line up in authority horizontally, but rather vertically—in order of seniority based on the date of apostolic ordination given their uninterrupted service in the Q12):
Oaks (as President of the Twelve though serving temporarily in the First Presidency)
Ballard (acting president of the Twelve)
Each apostle is bound to conform his views to his seniors.
This is how unanimity in apostolic decisions is guaranteed.
Point 3. Holland was required to give his “musket speech” by Oaks and Nelson or he wouldn’t have given it. The text runs against his nature, but he gave it because he is bound to obey the decisions of his seniors as revelation even when it hurts (hence the tears)
Point 4. Holland was sent to give the speech because he is known for compassion; he was chosen in order to let people know that obedience comes first not compassion; this reason is why Uchtdorf was dropped from the First Presidency. One may therefore say that Holland was Uchtdorfed!
Point 5. The reason Nelson and Oaks, through Holland, are doubling down on their policy of “love the sinner but hate the sin of same-sexness” is because the LGBTQ+ community threatens the rigid concepts of family set forth in the 1995 Proclamation on the Family (probably authored by Oaks) which concepts have replaced the Gospel.
Point 6. The Proclamation on the Family teaches that we are saved by being sealed into the family into which we are born. The Gospel of Christ teaches that the we must be saved from the biological family by being born again.
Point 7. The LDS apostles have replaced Mormon soteriological theology with church ecclesiology.
I am uncertain to what extent Paul Toscano’s conclusions are correct.
But consider Milgram experiment
The Milgram experiment(s) on obedience to authority figures was a series of social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram. They measured the willingness of study participants, men from a diverse range of occupations with varying levels of education, to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to believe that they were assisting an unrelated experiment, in which they had to administer electric shocks to a “learner”. These fake electric shocks gradually increased to levels that would have been fatal had they been real.
Are we ever willing participants in any such real-world examples?
– Tom Irvine
“Christ breaks the rifle” by Otto Pankok, 1950
“Otto Pankok was a German printmaker defamed by the Nazis as a ‘degenerate artist’ because his central theme was the sufferings of the oppressed. His work clearly reveals the influence of van Gogh, whom he revered. In 1950 he created the woodcut, “Christ breaks the rifle” which was later used by the German Christian peace movement leading up to the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989.” —Michael Frost
The student’s name is Conner Ray Murray. He is apparently a business major at BYU. To what extent was Conner’s action influenced by Elder Holland’s “Musket” admonition?
Update 9/11/21 from KUTV2 News reporter Daniel Woodruff:
BYU spokesperson says the man caught on camera pouring water on chalk art supporting the LGBTQ community and using a gay slur is no longer a student at the university.
If someone brings a musket or any lethal weapon to your church building or campus, remember: Run, Hide, Fight
Elder Jeffrey R. Holland gave a talk to BYU faculty on August 23, 2021. Complete Talk
Here is an excerpt where Elder Holland quotes other general authorities:
Three years later, 2017, Elder Dallin H. Oaks, not then but soon to be in the First Presidency where he would sit, only one chair — one heartbeat — away from the same position President Nelson now has, quoted our colleague Elder Neal A. Maxwell who had said:
“In a way[,] [Latter-day Saint] scholars at BYU and elsewhere are a little bit like the builders of the temple in Nauvoo, who worked with a trowel in one hand and a musket in the other. Today scholars building the temple of learning must also pause on occasion to defend the kingdom. I personally think,” Elder Maxwell went on to say, “this is one of the reasons the Lord established and maintains this university. The dual role of builder and defender is unique and ongoing. I am grateful we have scholars today who can handle, as it were, both trowels and muskets.”
Then Elder Oaks said challengingly, “I would like to hear a little more musket fire from this temple of learning.”
Seems like Elder Holland’s talk may be a modern version of Sidney Rigdon “Salt Sermon” from June 17, 1838. Rigdon’s sermon was a stern condemnation of Mormon dissenters.
“If the salt have lost its savor, wherewith shall it be salted?
It is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.”
(See also Rigdon’s July 4th oration where he took a militant stance against Missourians).
The Danites were led by Dr. Sampson Avard, and the group appears to have been formally formed about the time that Sidney Rigdon gave his Salt Sermon in Far West, in which he gave apostates an ultimatum to get out or suffer consequences.
Instead of Danites, we now have DezNat.
The modern apostates and dissenters in Elder Holland’s eyes are those who support gay marriage or are actively LGBTQIA+.
I was disturbed by Elder Holland’s violent imagery of using “muskets” to silence the voices of a marginalized group which has been subject to violence and murder over the years.
Note that a lesbian couple had been shot and killed in Moab, Utah a few days earlier. News Story.
See also: Orlando Nightclub Shooting
Firearms are prohibited in LDS Church Buildings. This policy should include metaphorical weapons as well. Firearm Reference.
Leaders should be extraordinarily cautious using fiery rhetoric against real or imagined enemies. Brigham Young may not have directly ordered the Mountain Meadows Massacre. But Young’s rhetoric stirred up those who committed the atrocity according to historian Juanita Brooks.
– Tom Irvine
The overt, spoken message of BYU’s faculty meeting was that inclusion is important; the unfortunate and unspoken subtext of Elder Holland’s talk was that the voices of non-white, non-heterosexual, non-male members of the Church are unimportant.
As BYU looks forward to the second half of its second century, erasing difference and implicitly upholding one particular social location as normative for everyone won’t equip students to succeed in a diverse world.
See also: Washington Post Article
My queer joy is queer power.
Say it with me.My queer joy is queer power.
Take notice at what cis-straight supremacists are pointing their muskets at. Lighting the “Y.” A proud gay BYU student embracing his identity over the pulpit. Queer youth sharing their testimony of God’s love for them just as they are. Color the Campus. BYU Pride. Supportive faculty and leaders. Happy queer families. Queer Mormon theology. Queer testimonials. Talk of same-sex sealings. Trans folks embracing gender euphoria through the Spirit.
They are pointing their muskets at what they perceive to be the most threatening. And what is most threatening to them? Our authentic expressions of queer joy.
Shame is a powerful tool. It worked on me. My community, church, and religion had me convinced that who I was, even down to my biological makeup, was so shameful that the only way out was to die. Indeed, queer shaming is a powerful tool. If they colonize your mind they don’t have to use muskets. Don’t forget that the war in heaven was a war of ideas.However, what has proven to be an equally if not more powerful tool is queer joy.
They will point their muskets at a rainbow “Y.” They will cut the mic when a queer teen shares her testimony. They will call happy queer families “counterfeit” because they know our queer joy is queer power. Our thriving, happiness, peace, and joy is a direct threat to their misguided attempts to shame us into submission.
If you do not feel joyful, I do not blame you. There is a time and place for all our emotions. Your feelings are valid, and you owe it to yourself to honor them—all of them. However, keep in mind they are not pointing their muskets at our queer rage, grief, frustration, depression, or sadness. They are pointing their muskets at our queer joy, flourishing, and shamelessness.
Our queer joy is queer power.
Stay strong. Stay hydrated. Take your meds and make time for a walk. Stay safe today. You are powerful. Love you all.
I love my people. Mormons are, for better or worse, mine. And I am so sick and tired of seeing Latter-day Saint leaders sell pain as God’s love. I’m exhausted from seeing good, earnest people be led to believe that love is so harsh. It impacts more than people can ever imagine.
Here’s the worst part, Holland has no excuse here. He knows the impact of his words- he’s been presented with them over and over. Either he doesn’t care, he’s trying to prove something, or he’s just deeply cruel.
Sending love to my LGBTQ+ Saints trying their best to make it work. I’m really sorry our people are so damaged. Generations of pain and trauma comes out as sugar-coated severity and religious callousness and the most vulnerable pay the price. Instead of taking care of our own, we pass around violence and call it scripture.
Also from Lindsay
For those defending Elder Holland’s speech, saying it has been taken out of context- point your muskets at the ground my friends… Plenty of people are taking his comments and turning them into something. I’m hearing reports of increased homophobia and bigotry out there. The speech has emboldened people (like the kid at BYU spewing hate speech and washing off the chalk art) to be more hateful. Don’t try to tell me Holland’s words are benign. They are not. He is a man in a position of power and his words have consequences.
My dear loved ones!! If you’re willing to listen, I have some feelings I’d like to share.
This has been a hard week for me and for my communities. It’s been hard for members of my family. It’s been hard for members of the church in which I grew up. It’s been hard for friends who are members and allies of the alphabet mafia.
I have seen many posts reacting to certain events, and those reactions come from all ends of the spectrum. There have been pleading apologies, zealous declarations, and outraged mockeries of various parties involved. My post today is not about what was said by the leader of the church. My post is in response to some of the rhetoric I’ve seen this week.
The number one thing I’ve seen from those who support the words spoken by Elder Holland is: “This needs to be taken in context.” Many were concerned that certain analogies and admonitions were being quoted in a misleading way, making the statement seem harsher than it was. I’ve seen people say that one needs to watch the talk, rather than just read it, so that the true intentions and emotions of the speaker could be properly understood. Indeed, emotions can be a beautiful way to express one’s true intent. However, no emotion can cancel out the words that are being said. Words matter. If unkind words are said in a loving tone, they are still unkind. If untrue words are said as the speaker chokes with emotion, those words are still untrue. If false and misleading information is presented after a speaker has expressed love to the audience, that information is still misleading. Words matter.
I’ve also seen a whole lot of: “I know this man, and he is kind.” I understand where this one is coming from. This speaker used to be my very favorite. I loved the way he could make me feel hope when I had very little. I have listened to this particular discourse and read it multiple times, and I will say that in this instance while his words may have been nice, they were not kind. Humiliating and condemning a faithful individual for calling himself a “gay son of God” during a university-reviewed and approved speech was unkind. Speaking about the need for members to stand strong in their beliefs about the sin of LGBTQ lifestyles, and then calling on those members to metaphorically get out their muskets to defend the church-approved version of the family was unkind. Speaking about the love that he and his fellow leaders have for members of the community, then telling them they need to hide such a fundamental part of themselves is unkind.
If this were another matter, I wouldn’t be posting about it. I respect beliefs that differ from my own, particularly those held by members of the church since I completely understand their mindset. However, when I start to see defense of harmful and abusive rhetoric, I feel I have to say something. This is literally a matter of life and death. There are people at BYU who are afraid. There are teenagers in the homes of active members who are afraid. I have had students stay in my classroom for hours after school because they are afraid to go home. They are afraid their parents will “find out” who they are. There are many who, when taught that it is immoral for them to ever seek out love in this life, decide to hasten the arrival of the next one.
Many reading this may think, “Oh, that’s such a shame. I would be supportive if this were my child! I would be different!” But do your loved ones know that? The phrase “Love the sinner, hate the sin” really just means, “I think you’re wrong, but I want you to believe I’m overcoming my judgment of you in order to be the bigger person here.” The phrase “I love you, but I just can’t condone your lifestyle” really just means “I know I should love you, but I need to show you I’m right by constantly reminding you that I do not approve of the way you live or love.” Expressions of love should not include the word “but”, spoken or implied.
Believe me, your loved ones know what you believe. If you ask a gay son or daughter about their dating life, they will not mistakenly assume that you are going back on your beliefs. If you attend a gay wedding, they will not mistakenly assume that you’ve changed your mind about all of it. They will assume that you have realized that your love can shine with them in every aspect of their happiness.
I’ve had a pretty hard last couple of weeks. Part of that started at a wedding luncheon for one of my dear cousins. It was so wonderful to see my entire family together like that. We talked and laughed and ate, and it was beautiful. Then I had some conversations wherein well-meaning family members bore their testimony to me. And I had the realization that it was entirely possible that almost none of the people in attendance that day would come celebrate with me if I were ever to get married. I imagined a lonely luncheon. I imagined how it would feel to be sitting up there with the love of my life, looking out at whoever came and knowing that they were dying inside on the most wonderful, blissful day of my life.
I know my family loves me. But I know that many of them are disappointed in me. I know that many of them judge me. And I understand that. I understand the mindset they are in. But that doesn’t make it hurt any less.
Words matter. Your words. Words of your leaders. Words you repeat. Words you whisper. Words you shout. Words you write. Words you defend.
If you do not believe that those words spoken by a leader were harmful, then please listen to the voices of those at whom they were fired. Listen when we tell you that we feel betrayed by somebody we trusted. Please don’t invalidate our pain just because you yourself do not understand or experience it.
Your friendly neighborhood gae
Stop saying “struggles” and “same-sex attraction.” LGBTQ+ is not a disorder.
I work for a well-known, private corporation in a liberal state. I just completed a “Preventing harassment & discrimination” annual training, as did all employees. I learned about the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), etc. The training included a statement that the company “prohibits discrimination, harassment, and retaliation of or against employees or applicants for employment on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex or gender, sexual orientation, gender expression and identity, pregnancy, national origin, military or veteran status, marital status, political affiliation, genetic information, the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person with a disability, or any other status or characteristic protected by federal, state, and/or local law.” The company policies also prohibit making casual remarks or jokes that may be offensive. I support these policies.
The LDS Church and BYU are not bound by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or EEOC rules as far as I know. Elder Holland does not work at my company. But if he did, then he would have been fired if he had made those remarks.
My real point is that “all in” BYU students are going to be unprepared to interact with LGBTQIA+ colleagues if they go to work at a Fortune 500 company. Their BYU diploma may even be a hindrance to receiving a job offer.
– Tom Irvine
Utah politician calls for “muskets” to defend seminary against LGBTQ Mormon students
When an LDS Apostle Calls You Out: Gay BYU Valedictorian Matt Easton
Love songs perpetuate a false hope that love is all you need if you want to be together forever. And some erroneously believe that the Resurrection of Jesus Christ provides a promise that all people will be with their loved ones after death.
– President Russell M. Nelson, “Come Follow Me,” April 2019 General Conference
With all due respect to President Nelson, I am thinking that John Lennon’s message was closer to Christ’s teachings on this one. – Tom Irvine
See also: The Christ-like Love Kingdom of Glory
Internet killed the Correlation Star. – Tom Irvine